| |
I know this is old, but isn't this illegal?
by NotLarry at 8:47 am EST, Nov 19, 2007 |
This is old news I know, but my question is, as a service provider are they allowed MIM attacks like this (am I misreading this, isn't that what masquerading as the other computer your talking to and sending false data is?). |
| |
RE: I know this is old, but isn't this illegal?
by dc0de at 1:03 pm EST, Nov 20, 2007 |
NotLarry wrote:
This is old news I know, but my question is, as a service provider are they allowed MIM attacks like this (am I misreading this, isn't that what masquerading as the other computer your talking to and sending false data is?).
This is a great point, and one we should take up with the EFF. |
|
| | |
RE: I know this is old, but isn't this illegal?
by dc0de at 1:08 pm EST, Nov 20, 2007 |
dc0de wrote: NotLarry wrote:
This is old news I know, but my question is, as a service provider are they allowed MIM attacks like this (am I misreading this, isn't that what masquerading as the other computer your talking to and sending false data is?).
This is a great point, and one we should take up with the EFF.
The EFF Shows http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/10/eff-tests-agree-ap-comcast-forging-packets-to-interfere Perhaps we should start sending TCP RST packets to comcast's website, and billing systems... since it's clear that it's OK to forge these on their network. Anyone? |
|
There is a redundant post from Dagmar not displayed in this view.
|
|
