Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling Bolstering Gadget Privacy at U.S. Border | Threat Level | Wired.com

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling Bolstering Gadget Privacy at U.S. Border | Threat Level | Wired.com
Topic: Miscellaneous 5:17 pm EST, Jan 13, 2014

Without issuing a ruling, the justices let stand an appeals court’s decision that U.S. border agents may indeed undertake a search of a traveler’s gadgets content on a whim, just like they could with a suitcase or a vehicle.

I think the reporter here might be making too much of this decision by the Supreme Court.

In this case the court ruled that a border search was OK because reasonable suspicion existed. A stronger statement would be a ruling that border search evidence was inadmissible in a particular case because reasonable suspicion did not exist.

Nevertheless, these court battles have been useful because they indicate a framework in which random searches of electronics are really not permissible. As long as the government doesn't step outside that framework, everything is fine. If these searches are only performed where reasonable suspicion exists, there won't be an example of evidence obtained in a situation where reasonable suspicion did not exist, so there won't be an argument in court where that evidence has to be thrown out.

For me the big question is the factual one - Is CBP doing random electronics searches or not? They do random searches of bags. Administration officials have suggested that they are not doing random searches of electronics, but perhaps I can be forgiven for lacking confidence in the statements of government officials regarding civil liberties issues. As long as they are not and the door to that is firmly shut, our rights are secure.

Of course, it would be preferable if the standard at the border was probable cause rather than reasonable suspicion, but I believe such a change would need to happen at the legislature rather than the court, and the political will to enact such a change does not exist.

Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling Bolstering Gadget Privacy at U.S. Border | Threat Level | Wired.com



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0