Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: competing visions of the technological future. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

competing visions of the technological future
by noteworthy at 8:05 am EDT, Mar 19, 2015

Chris Betz:

Forces often seek to undermine and disrupt technology and people, attempting to weaken the very devices and services people have come to depend on and trust.

Ashton Carter:

The cyber mission force represents American ideals in cyberspace. Keeping cyberspace open and free for everyone is its central focus.

Eugene Kaspersky:

This is how we save the world: by making the cyberworld safe and secure for everyone. We detect, research and disclose any malware -- regardless of origin or purpose.

The Balkanization of IT security will have a very significant long-term negative impact on global IT security, so let's do what we do best: analyze cyberthreats, reveal the digital villains, and protect our future. And let's do this all together.

Joseph Menn:

The balkanization of the security industry reflects broader rifts in the technology markets ...

Sue Halpern:

If the "calamity prophets" are finally right, and this time the machines really will win out, this is why. It's not just that computers seem to be infiltrating every aspect of our lives, it's that they have infiltrated them and are infiltrating them with breathless rapidity. It's not just that life seems to have sped up, it's that it has. And that speed, and that infiltration, appear to have a life of their own.

What Brynjolfsson and McAfee are also saying is that while technological progress is going to force many people to submit to tightly monitored control of their movements, with their productivity clearly measured, that progress is also going to benefit perhaps just a few as it races ahead. And that, it appears, is what is happening.

It is naive to believe that government is competent, let alone in a position, to control the development and deployment of robots, self-generating algorithms, and artificial intelligence. Government has too many constituent parts that have their own, sometimes competing, visions of the technological future. Business, of course, is self-interested and resists regulation. We, the people, are on our own here -- though if the AI developers have their way, not for long.

Lisa Lieberman:

Fear is democracy's undoing, and the unraveling begins at home.


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics