Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Darfur conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Darfur conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
by Decius at 2:10 am EDT, Jun 3, 2005

The Darfur conflict is an ongoing conflict in the Darfur region of western Sudan, mainly between the Janjaweed, a government-supported militia recruited from local Arab tribes, and the non-Arab peoples of the region. Note that both sides are largely black in skin tone, and the distinction between "Arab" and "non-Arab" common in western media is heavily disputed by many people, including the Sudanese government. The conflict has been widely described as "ethnic cleansing", and frequently as "genocide".

As I surfed the poliblogosphere one meme that seemed to be common on right and left blogs was Darfur. Both political groups are covering the issue and seemed concerned at the lack of MSM coverage or attention from the Administration. Ironically, Bush called the Darfur situation genocide today, apparently after not mentioning the issue for 3 months.


 
RE: Darfur conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
by Rattle at 7:43 pm EDT, Jun 4, 2005

Decius wrote:
As I surfed the poliblogosphere one meme that seemed to be common on right and left blogs was Darfur. Both political groups are covering the issue and seemed concerned at the lack of MSM coverage or attention from the Administration. Ironically, Bush called the Darfur situation genocide today, apparently after not mentioning the issue for 3 months.

Powell referred to the Darfur situation as a genocide back in September. Congress made a similar statement in July. Its clearly the position of our State Dept. Its not at all clear what anyone intends to do about it though.

Doing any type of military deployment in that area would be on the level of our deployment in Iraq in terms of the unease it would place on Saudi Arabia. Even though there is a sea in the way, it would put troops within 2,000 miles of Mecca. I think this would be significant in the eyes of the "arab street", as at that point there would be very few directions you could look in while walking around in a circle and not have US military presence within short term strike range. Not that there is actually any desire for a strike on Mecca or anything even remotely similar, but logic seems to run thin among even many moderates...


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics