Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

RE: Justices, 5-4, Back Seizure of Property for Development - New York Times

search


RE: Justices, 5-4, Back Seizure of Property for Development - New York Times
by Jamie at 12:01 pm EDT, Jun 23, 2005

Decius wrote:

A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses against their will for private development in a decision anxiously awaited in communities where economic growth often is at war with individual property rights.

This is a sad sad day. Individual property rights and individual rights are very important.

RE: Justices, 5-4, Back Seizure of Property for Development - New York Times


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics