Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

RE: Justices, 5-4, Back Seizure of Property for Development - New York Times

search


RE: Justices, 5-4, Back Seizure of Property for Development - New York Times
by skullaria at 6:55 pm EDT, Jun 23, 2005

Decius wrote:

A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses against their will for private development in a decision anxiously awaited in communities where economic growth often is at war with individual property rights.

What can I say? I'm REALLY not happy about this. This is what a Republican controlled government DOES though, and I'm clearly in the minority.

RE: Justices, 5-4, Back Seizure of Property for Development - New York Times


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics