Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

RE: Recipe for Destruction - New York Times

search


RE: Recipe for Destruction - New York Times
by flynn23 at 2:21 pm EDT, Oct 24, 2005

Decius wrote:

A Science staff writer, Jocelyn Kaiser, said, "Both the authors and Science's editors acknowledge concerns that terrorists could, in theory, use the information to reconstruct the 1918 flu virus." And yet the journal required that the full genome sequence be made available on the GenBank database as a condition for publishing the paper.

Proponents of publishing this data point out that valuable insights have been gained from the virus's recreation. These insights could help scientists across the world detect and defend against future pandemics, including avian flu.

There are other approaches, however, to sharing the scientifically useful information. Specific insights - for example, that a key mutation noted in one gene may in part explain the virus's unusual virulence - could be published without disclosing the complete genetic recipe. The precise genome could potentially be shared with scientists with suitable security assurances.

Bill Joy and Ray Kurzweil oppose "full disclosure" of immuno-security vulnerabilities.

These are the same guys who became multi-millionaires by virtue of the exposure of BSD Unix source code and Bob Moog's schematics for the Polymoog. What a gesture of thanks.

RE: Recipe for Destruction - New York Times


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics