Mike the Usurper wrote:
As no evidence in the record indicates that any other scientific proposition’s validity rests on belief in God, nor is the Court aware of any such scientific propositions, Professor Behe’s assertion constitutes substantial evidence that in his view, as is commensurate with other prominent ID leaders, ID is a religious and not a scientific proposition.
Judge Jones takes the ID case and manages to rip it into little itty bitty pieces, which is easy to do in legalese, and then piss on the pieces, which is very hard to do in legalese. If you understand legalese, it's a masterpiece of damning insult.
Update: It's a damn long read but wow does he lambaste these guys.
It really is quite something.
