Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Russian arms at risk from terrorists. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Russian arms at risk from terrorists
by Jeremy at 6:41 pm EDT, Jul 28, 2002

The US government ... has great trouble moving beyond puny measures where a poorly defended collection of nerve gas canisters in Siberia is concerned -- a collection that could kill each person on the planet 46 times.

The government already has officials whose job descriptions include pestering scientists around the country not to publish information about their research methods in certain fields of study out of the nonspecific worry that it might fall into the "wrong" hands.

However, the government has enormous difficulty making an effort to get into any of four former biological weapons sites in what used to be the Soviet Union -- places terrorist networks have known about for years in frightening detail.

[Discussion of the Nunn-Lugar program ... ]

The biggest successes have involved strategic nuclear weapons, but great gobs of chemical, biological, tactical nuclear, and conventional submarines capable of carrying cruise missiles remain on the agenda. The miracle is that to date nothing has been stolen or sold to a terrorist network and that no scientist on the edge of poverty has succumbed to the financial incentives from those networks and rogue nations to turn traitor.

The best illustration of why this has got to stop may be found in Siberia, [where Russians are storing] 1.9 million small canisters of VX and sarin nerve gas. Each canister contains enough gas to kill 180,000 people.

Thomas Oliphant's column in today's Boston Globe. I've blogged about Nunn-Lugar before; my purpose here is to point out that there are much more pressing concerns in this arena than the hypothetical misuse of a _Science_ article.

Who needs a recipe when you've got McDonald's?


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics