Mike the Usurper wrote:
Unconstitutional search and seizure anyone? They already could do this, they just needed a court order and some measure of proof the money was being used illegally. Now they think they can do so by executive fiat?

But of course they do. They can do whatever they want.

And just out of curiosity, what does "working to threaten stability in Iraq" mean?

Indeed. If a citizen sends money to family or friends there, i suppose it's likely they'll end up frozen and investigated, in that order, rather than the reverse.

RE: U.S. to crack down on terror bankrolls - USATODAY.com