Mike the Usurper wrote:

Jello wrote:

Mike the Usurper wrote:

Jello wrote:

Dagmar wrote:
Not only is she somewhat incoherent at times, she's clearly all for invading anywhere she damn well feels like.

So, are we ready to start seriously campaigning for Obama, or at least putting up signs that say "OH GOD ANYONE BUT MCCAIN" yet?

She sounds like a nincompoop. Charlie Gibson is having to explain foreign policy to her... he sounds more qualified for the VP position than her.

Charlie Gibson for VP!

Sorry no. If you listen to Charlie's explanation of the Bush Doctrine, he gets it wrong. The Bush Doctrine is PREVENTATIVE war, not preemptive. Preemption has been accepted for a very long time. Preventative is a whole 'nother story.

I believe he used a different word as well though, 'anticipatory self-defense'. Which sounds more like the Bush doctrine than a simple pre-emptive strike.

GIBSON: The Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right to a preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that?

Given that incorrect description, well, you see the results.

He's close, and the phrase 'anticipatory self-defense' is a lot closer than anything she could muster. He flubbed the explanation a bit, but she'd never heard of it. She's never thought about a rationale for invasion.

RE: Sarah Palin talks about Bush Doctrine