Create an Account
username: password:
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Google & the Future of Books. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Google & the Future of Books
by noteworthy at 9:59 pm EST, Jan 26, 2009

Robert Darnton:

How can we navigate through the information landscape that is only beginning to come into view? The question is more urgent than ever following the recent settlement between Google and the authors and publishers who were suing it for alleged breach of copyright. For the last four years, Google has been digitizing millions of books, including many covered by copyright, from the collections of major research libraries, and making the texts searchable online. The authors and publishers objected that digitizing constituted a violation of their copyrights. After lengthy negotiations, the plaintiffs and Google agreed on a settlement, which will have a profound effect on the way books reach readers for the foreseeable future. What will that future be?

No one knows, because the settlement is so complex that it is difficult to perceive the legal and economic contours in the new lay of the land. But those of us who are responsible for research libraries have a clear view of a common goal: we want to open up our collections and make them available to readers everywhere. How to get there? The only workable tactic may be vigilance: see as far ahead as you can; and while you keep your eye on the road, remember to look in the rearview mirror.

No one can predict what will happen. We can only read the terms of the settlement and guess about the future. If Google makes available, at a reasonable price, the combined holdings of all the major US libraries, who would not applaud? Would we not prefer a world in which this immense corpus of digitized books is accessible, even at a high price, to one in which it did not exist?

Whether or not I have understood the settlement correctly, its terms are locked together so tightly that they cannot be pried apart. At this point, neither Google, nor the authors, nor the publishers, nor the district court is likely to modify the settlement substantially. Yet this is also a tipping point in the development of what we call the information society. If we get the balance wrong at this moment, private interests may outweigh the public good for the foreseeable future, and the Enlightenment dream may be as elusive as ever.

You might wonder:

Is more what we really need?

Before you take sides, consider Twain:

When an entirely new and untried political project is sprung upon the people, they are startled, anxious, timid, and for a time they are mute, reserved, noncommittal. The great majority of them are not studying the new doctrine and making up their minds about it, they are waiting to see which is going to be the popular side.

Oh, wait, is copyright protection preventing you from accessing the work of an author who died 99 years ago?

RE: Google & the Future of Books
by knowbuddy at 11:36 pm EST, Jan 26, 2009

Compare and contrast with the ideas explored in Robert Reich's Supercapitalism: profits for shareholders versus profits for humanity; state-sponsored monopolies for the common good; a James Burke-inspired level of "how did we get from there to here?"; etc. This reads like a (florid and dramatic) example from a revised edition of Supercapitalism looking backward from fifteen years from now.

I'd love to read the same article written two other ways: one by a publishing mainstream author who makes their living from their writing, and another by an academic who makes their academic career by writing. While interesting, this one was a bit too obviously from a librarian point of view.

Powered By Industrial Memetics