Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Top Politics and Law Memes

search

sponsored links

popular topics
Miscellaneous
Society
Technology
Politics and Law
Security
Games
Biotechnology

browse topics
Back to Main
Back to Society
Civil Liberties
Intellectual Property

 
Current Topic: Politics and LawSee Different Timeframes

MemeStreams combines the power of weblogs and social networking. The members of our community work together to find interesting content on the web. As you use the site, it learns your interests, and provides new links it thinks you will like. Read more about MemeStreams or create an account!

Police not violating 4th Amendment by placing GPS on your car when it isn't in your garage?

Here's the quiz: if police attach a GPS device to your car and track you using that device, without having got a warrant to do so, is the Fourth Amendment violated?

And here's the issue: an Oregonian named Juan Pineda-Moreno had such a thing happen to him and was convicted of growing marijuana after police tracked his car to a suspected growing site. Pineda-Moreno appealed, citing the fact that on two occasions DEA agents placed tracking devices on his car while it was in his driveway – which he considered private, not public, property – and therefore breached his Fourth Amendment rights.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, ruling that Pineda-Moreno didn't have any signage or barriers around his property to clearly indicate that it was private property, and since "an individual going up to the house to deliver the newspaper or to visit someone would have to go through the driveway to get to the house," why couldn't the DEA? Further, the court ruled that the underside of his car isn't private because "[t]he undercarriage is part of the car's exterior, and as such, is not afforded a reasonable expectation of privacy."

Police not violating 4th Amendment by placing GPS on your car when it isn't in your garage?


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0