Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

RE: DoJ sues Google for failing to turn over records!

search

k
Picture of k
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

k's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
  Music
   Pop
   Electronic Music
   Rap & Hip Hop
   Indie Rock
   Jazz
   Punk
   Vocalist
  Photography
  TV
Business
  Tech Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
  Video Games
   PC Video Games
Health and Wellness
  Fitness
  Medicine
  Nutrition
  Weight Loss
Home and Garden
  Cooking
  Holidays
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Martial Arts
  Camping and Hiking
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   Atlanta
Science
  Astronomy
  Biology
  Chemistry
  Environment
  Geology
  History
  Math
  Medicine
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Activism
  Crime
  Economics
  Futurism
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
  Relationships
  Religion
Sports
  Football
  Skiing & Snowboarding
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
   Cyber-Culture
   PC Hardware
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
   Computer Networking
   Computing Platforms
    Macintosh
    Linux
    Microsoft Windows
   Software Development
    Open Source Development
    Perl Programming
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
RE: DoJ sues Google for failing to turn over records!
Topic: Current Events 5:47 pm EST, Jan 23, 2006

Acidus wrote:

The points you raise are good ones but completely secondary to what I thought I made clear. There is nothing "trival" or "innocuous" about this. Frankly I don't care that the search data isn't associated with an IP. The government wants the intellectual property (ie the search strings) of a privately held company and is suing them for not turning it over. Unless there is some kind of "contempt of congress" thing going on I am disgusted by this.

On a side note Kerry, last time I checked I don't dismiss your opinions with a simple "whatever" or accusations of being a drama queen.

[ Apologies if i was overly glib. The "whatever" in response to your post on cringley was in reference to your "gold star" ranking, which I think was undeserved, and which I tried to go on and explain. I didn't mean it as an indictment of your intellect, and I don't think it was exceedingly dismissive when followed by a relatively long post. Still, I apologize and will try to avoid that offence in future replies.

As for this post, I truly wasn't targeting the "histrionics" comment individually... everyone on the whole internet has been all worked up about this, on both sides of the political spectrum, and I think everyone is being somewhat excessive about it. Again, perhaps I ought to have been clear about that, but I honestly didn't consider it to be a personal attack.

Now as far as my reply expressing "secondary" issues, the post i replied to didn't say anything about intellectual property, but discussed the privacy implications... Here are your specific words from the top of the thread :

They did what now! How many of you want anything you have ever typed into Google to be in the government's hands? How many of you are pissed that other search engines just said "Here!"

...

Now for the really scary part of this. I have read the above paragraph countless times before. The only difference is back then it said China instead of the government and people instead of minors. Why don't you congressional ass clowns try to "understand the behavior" of my right to privacy or the term of illegal search and seizure!

My response was meant to indicate that I don't believe this case shows a massive violation of privacy, but has the potential to set bad precedent for future violations, and then continued to discuss what I see as the wider context, which is of greater concern to me. Granted, the discussion of the broader anti-porn crusade was not "on topic" in regards to your post, but I don't think it negates what it says above.

As it happens, I find the intellectual property discussion (e.g. the searches entered by users being treated as a proprietary data by Google) interesting too. Google is a giant corporation which, as part and parcel of it's business maintains vast stores of data regarding the activities and dispositions of tens of millions of internet users. I think we really should pay close attention to how they (and other similar businesses) respond to private and public attempts to acquire those data.

I hope I haven't put anyone off... if I ever seem dismissive, it's probably careless, and I'll apologize if I feel I was wrong to do it. You clearly believe this is a serious enough issue to become impassioned about, so lets be as precise as possible while we carry out the discussion.

I'm still uncertain in regards to your comments about congress. I grant you that the law being utilized here was passed by congress, but the investigation, such as it is, is being carried out by the Department of Justice. Based on past statements, it's being prosecuted at the behest of Attorney General Gonzalez and FBI Director Mueller. Certainly there are members of congress who want to see this happen, but the immediate fault (in my opinion) lies with the AG's absurd crusade against indecency when there are a) actual child pornographers to find and b) national security issues which ought to take precedence.

On the topic of the data requests, I expect every corporation who holds personally identifiable data about me to be extremely careful about releasing it. I think there should be a generic requirement for all corporations to issue a press release any time they turn over large quantities of data to any third party. I'm less concerned with the fact that data is sometimes turned over than with the fact that it happens without anyone's knowledge. (This is my key issue with the wiretapping situation as well -- do what's necessary, yes, but let's have a record with a neutral body, say, the FISA court, at the very least.) I'm glad google decided to say something, if only because now we know it's going on. Knowing what the details are we can make decisions about the validity of the requests and have arguments, and sort it all out. I see this kind of forum as the future of public discourse, but it's all meaningless without some level of transparency. Let google decide what to do on the basis of what it's customers believe is correct... it's not really possible yet, but that's what I'd like to see. For now, those who think there's nothing to worry about can do nothing, those who are angry can exercise their activism. -k]

RE: DoJ sues Google for failing to turn over records!



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0