Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Paul Boutin : Biowar for Dummies

search

k
Picture of k
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

k's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
  Music
   Pop
   Electronic Music
   Rap & Hip Hop
   Indie Rock
   Jazz
   Punk
   Vocalist
  Photography
  TV
Business
  Tech Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
  Video Games
   PC Video Games
Health and Wellness
  Fitness
  Medicine
  Nutrition
  Weight Loss
Home and Garden
  Cooking
  Holidays
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Martial Arts
  Camping and Hiking
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   Atlanta
Science
  Astronomy
  Biology
  Chemistry
  Environment
  Geology
  History
  Math
  Medicine
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Activism
  Crime
  Economics
  Futurism
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
  Relationships
  Religion
Sports
  Football
  Skiing & Snowboarding
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
   Cyber-Culture
   PC Hardware
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
   Computer Networking
   Computing Platforms
    Macintosh
    Linux
    Microsoft Windows
   Software Development
    Open Source Development
    Perl Programming
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Paul Boutin : Biowar for Dummies
Topic: Biology 11:54 am EST, Feb 22, 2006

A few months ago, Roger Brent, a geneticist who runs a California biotech firm, sent me an unpublished paper in which he wrote that genetically engineered bioweapons developed by small teams are a bigger threat than suitcase nukes.

Brent is one of a growing number of researchers who believe that a bioterrorist wouldn’t need a team of virologists and state funding. He says advances in DNA-hacking technology have reached the point where an evil lab assistant with the right resources could do the job.

Gold Star, but I'm wondering how alarmist this is.

[ That last sentence of the quote quite evokes 12 Monkeys, probably purposefully.

I think the level of concern is as it should be. Nanochick could probably speak 1 million times more intelligently on the subject, but I'm convinced that the equipment and raw materials are trivial and getting more so.

The question becomes skills and training... even if you have the materials for a nuke, putting one together is non-trivial. In comparison, how much schooling would a potential terrorist need to get to work on bioweaponry? A PhD? How likely is that to happen? Still, when it comes down to it, it only has to happen once to be tremendously devastating, and it looks like it's easier than nuke building, all told. On top of which, it's *much* easier to transport and deploy than a nuke...

I think the analogy to computer tech is a good one. 25 years ago people were building computers with wirewrap techniques. Now you can click a couple buttons and have a blog, publush music, make movies, talk to anyone, anywhere.

I agree that bio is much greater potential threat than nuclear, at least in the hands of small actors. I think nations are still gunshy to move that direction because of the potential lack of control you have with bio... at least a nuke has a well defined blast radius. With bio, it's tough to banish scenarios in which you miscalculate the virulence or mutations occur and suddenly instead of killing a bunch of the enemy, you've killed yourself too, and everyone else. Small, independent malefactors may have no such yoke.

Anyway, my 2c.

Paul Boutin : Biowar for Dummies



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0