Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Afghanistan: Five Years Later, By Donald H. Rumsfeld

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Afghanistan: Five Years Later, By Donald H. Rumsfeld
Topic: War on Terrorism 10:21 pm EST, Nov  8, 2006

Today seems like a good day to re-recommend Rumsfeld's last public snowflake.

It was never going to be an easy mission. Not all the news about Afghanistan is encouraging. And yet, for all of the challenges the Afghan people face, there are many promising indicators.

Building a new nation is never a straight, steady climb upward. Today can sometimes look worse than yesterday -- or even two months ago. What matters is the overall trajectory: Where do things stand today when compared to what they were five years ago?

In Afghanistan, the trajectory is a hopeful and promising one.

A few Afghanistan news tidbits:

Kiwi Troops Destroy Opium In Afghanistan

They didn't actually seize it, but they did a really good job burning it.

Afghanistan mission worthwhile, Clinton tells luncheon audience

Bill Clinton today affirmed the need for American and Canadian forces to stay in Afghanistan.

Clinton said that it had been a "serious mistake" for the United States to invade Iraq at the same time that it also had troops involved in Afghanistan.

Winning in Afghanistan is "far, far more important, in terms of protecting Canada and America against terror," than Iraq, he said.

I'm sure that sounds snappy at a luncheon, but exactly how do you "win" Afghanistan? At least Iraqis can sell oil. It seems to me the best you can hope for is to stave off failure indefinitely.

Setting those poppies on fire is about as productive as a flag burning protest. What are we doing to encourage a stronger civil society in Afghanistan? At least Pakistani newspapers make room for Britney. Are you going to see that in the Afghan press?

Afghanistan: Five Years Later, By Donald H. Rumsfeld



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0