Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Post Haste

search

possibly noteworthy
Picture of possibly noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

possibly noteworthy's topics
Arts
Business
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
Local Information
  Food
Science
Society
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Intellectual Property
  Military
Sports
Technology
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Being "always on" is being always off, to something.

Be smarter at work, slack off - Mar. 17, 2006
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:30 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

Don't expect big thinking here ...

"Companies need to respect the time it takes to do strategic thinking," he says. "Task-oriented thinking is important too, of course. But bigger thinking is slow."

Be smarter at work, slack off - Mar. 17, 2006


The State of Iraq: An Update
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:29 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

Brookings drops the numbers.

These statistics may point to the possibility of a troop drawdown strategy for the United States — but while a strategically passable outcome still seems within reach, it is increasingly hard to believe that there are the makings of a major success for American foreign policy in Iraq.

The State of Iraq: An Update


Cry Wolfe
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:29 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

Can anyone explain why Mark Bowden is reviewing Tom Wolfe?

In one of many deft set pieces in Tom Wolfe's I Am Charlotte Simmons, a group of student journalists at the fictional Dupont University hold a meeting in the "lumpen-bohemian clutter" of their campus newsroom. The editor wants a firm story list for the next issue's fast-approaching deadline, but the discussion bogs down over an item that might just be important breaking news—they're not sure.

Cry Wolfe


Seed: Going Where No Report Has Gone Before
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:26 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

Considering how "Rising Above The Gathering Storm" was accepted here, this probably won't be seen as good news.

Several scientists probably did a double take when President Bush announced a plan to double funding for basic research over the next decade during January's State of the Union address. In recent years, the Oval Office couch had been cold to government scientists suggesting that the President request more funds for research. Instead, a grim trend of neglect for science ensued, culminating last year in the National Institutes of Health choking down their first budget cut since 1970.

Seed: Going Where No Report Has Gone Before


The Role of Music Preferences in Interpersonal Perception
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:23 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

"This research is based on the idea that people's preferences for music and other activities reveal a great deal about their personalities, lifestyles, and values."

ABSTRACT—How is information about people conveyed through their preferences for certain kinds of music? Here we show that individuals use their music preferences to communicate information about their personalities to observers, and that observers can use such information to form impressions of others. Study 1 revealed that music was the most common topic in conversations among strangers given the task of getting acquainted. Why was talk about music so prevalent? Study 2 showed that (a) observers were able to form consensual and accurate impressions on the basis of targets’ music preferences, (b) music preferences were related to targets’ personalities, (c) the specific cues that observers used tended to be the ones that were valid, and (d) music preferences reveal information that is different from that obtained in other zero-acquaintance contexts. Discussion focuses on the mechanisms that may underlie the links between personality and music preferences.

This looks like an interesting research area.

The Role of Music Preferences in Interpersonal Perception


TWELVE BOOKS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:20 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

How many have you read?

Principia Mathematica (1687) by Isaac Newton
Married Love (1918) by Marie Stopes
Magna Carta (1215) by members of the English ruling classes
Book of Rules of Association Football (1863) by a group of former English public-school men
On the Origin of Species (1859) by Charles Darwin
On the Abolition of the Slave Trade (1789) by William Wilberforce in Parliament, immediately printed in several versions
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) by Mary Wollstonecraft
Experimental Researches in Electricity (three volumes, 1839, 1844, 1855) by Michael Faraday
Patent Specification for Arkwright’s Spinning Machine (1769) by Richard Arkwright
The King James Bible (1611) by William Tyndale and 54 scholars appointed by the king
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) by Adam Smith
The First Folio (1623) by William Shakespeare

TWELVE BOOKS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD


And the winner is...
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:19 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

Of interest in the press conference held by the Department of Energy to announce the new contractor, was a bit of discussion about what would have happened if Lockheed had won the contract. Lockheed already runs Sandia National Laboratories, which create all the mechanisms in a nuclear weapon aside from the actual "nuclear package" - the core of the warhead. And a lot of these non-nuclear components are tres sophisticated and classified. If Lockheed had managed Los Alamos as well, it would also have been building nuclear components. The company would have been in a unique position - unique at least since the nuclear labs split into subsidiary operations decades ago - of working with designs for entire nuclear weapons.

And the winner is...


Seed: Skipping Peer Review
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:19 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

This is timely, given the recent release of "Intuition", blogged here last week.

The whirlwind pace of innovation in the 21st century conceals a dark secret of science: Research is generally at least a year old before it appears in scientific journals.

Publishing a study is often a downright lethargic process: Researchers with a hot new result submit an article to a journal, wait a minimum of three months for experts in the field to review the findings and then spend another few months revising to the reviewers' recommendations. When a paper is finally accepted, it is edited again and checked by the authors, only to linger—often for several more months—for its turn at the printer.

The process can take so long that some scientists have decided to avoid it altogether.

Seed: Skipping Peer Review


Seed: The Changing Face of Yellowstone
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:18 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

Subterranean shifts in basaltic magma are changing the face of Yellowstone, meaning eventually we may have to toss out some of those Ansel Adams calendars.

Seed: The Changing Face of Yellowstone


Murdoch Speaks at Annual Livery Lecture | Televisionpoint.com News
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:16 pm EST, Mar 19, 2006

Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive of News Corporation, has delivered the Annual Livery Lecture at The Worshipful Company of Stationers and Newspaper Makers. The speech is entitled 'The Dawn of A New Age of Discovery: Media 2006'.

Murdoch Speaks at Annual Livery Lecture | Televisionpoint.com News


(Last) Newer << 468 ++ 478 - 479 - 480 - 481 - 482 - 483 - 484 - 485 - 486 - 487 >> Older (First)
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0