Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Bookmarkopolis

search

Romanpoet
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Romanpoet's topics
Arts
Business
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
Current Events
Recreation
Local Information
Science
(Society)
Sports
Technology

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Current Topic: Society

Scalia opposed to separation of church and state
Topic: Society 1:29 am EST, Dec  5, 2004

] "There is something wrong with the principle of
] neutrality," said Scalia, considered among the court's
] staunchest conservatives. Neutrality as envisioned by the
] founding fathers, Scalia said, "is not neutrality between
] religiousness and nonreligiousness; it is between
] denominations of religion."

Our founding fathers and other great national leaders were brilliant men who developed powerful ideas about how to build a successful society. However, you have to put them in a context. Abraham Lincoln, for example, would be viewed as a contemptible bigot were he alive today, but that does not mean that we should not honor him and the value of his ideas. What Scalia misses is that the society which existed in 1776 is not the same society which exists today, and in fact it was a great deal less mature.

The valuable idea here is that the government should not get involved in the task of dictating religious beliefs or doctrine. However, in the context of the late 1700's all of the white people in America practiced some form of Christianity or Judaism. Other religions were certainly practiced by people who weren't white, but this mattered little in an institutionally racist society. So, in that context, references to God were not understood to fall into the scope of dictating religious doctrine. People were simply not aware of an example of a way of thinking which did not include God.

Today we are much more mature. There are a far wider array of religions acknowledged and practiced in our society, including a growing minority of the population that does not practice any religion at all. In that context the fundamental philosophy of the founders must be applied differently then it would have been applied 200+ years ago. That means building a society which respects religious beliefs but doesn't require them.

Of course, the cynical thought here is that Scalia is far too intelligent to have missed this distinction, or to be unaware of the context in which he lives. Its clear in the quotes taken in this article that he promotes a religious government, and opposes secularism. In doing so, he in fact advocates the establishment of religion, and stands opposed to the fundamental constitutional law that he is tasked with defending.

There is another argument in there, which Scalia does not make, but which must be asked...

Insofaras we can see that philosophically the values inherent in our system of government require protecting rights that the populace, on the whole, doesn't respect, how should we respond? One might argue that the democratic government ought to drive these changes, as if the court out steps the democracy too far its legitimacy is threatened. On the other hand, we don't need to defend popular rights. The whole purpose of limited government is to protect unpopular minorities from the tyranny of the majority. The Constitution, and the court, mean nothing, if we are simply operating on majority rule. How do you strike that balance?

To be honest, the impeachment mechanism provides a safety value through which a court that went too far could be reigned in by the democracy without violence and without threatening the basic institution.

So my answer is, Insofaras we can see that philosophically the values inherent in our system of government require protecting rights that the populace, on the whole, doesn't respect, we should respond by protecting those rights unless we would be impeached for doing so.

Scalia opposed to separation of church and state


Molatar's Castle
Topic: Society 8:03 am EST, Nov 23, 2004

"This site is dedicated to spreading the Gospel in the werewolf and furry communities. It is my hope that many trans-species people will accept Jesus as their Savior through this ministry. "

But wait, there's more!
"I no longer play roleplaying games. I don't need them. I have the Holy Spirit to give me miraculous powers. I have the Father to supply all my needs. I have Jesus to change me into a dragon and create neat lizard people to assist me in heaven. I don't need the fantasy because I have the reality."

Molatar's Castle


Some nice 8mm Vintage Pornography
Topic: Society 7:55 pm EST, Oct 31, 2004

You dont find vintage movies that often.

Some nice 8mm Vintage Pornography


Changes in GWB over 10 Years
Topic: Society 5:38 pm EDT, Oct 20, 2004

This coincides very well with the rotten library article on GWB. I've always thought he was just faking the 'gool ol' boy' persona. Nothing in his background is the slightest hint of blue collar.

Changes in GWB over 10 Years


RightWing Paraphenalia
Topic: Society 9:09 pm EDT, Sep 29, 2004

I think its a parody. Not sure though.

RightWing Paraphenalia


What do you want in your Christian Manga?
Topic: Society 1:42 am EDT, Sep  2, 2004

Yes, it's real.

See the stats at:
http://pub6.bravenet.com/vote/stats.php?usernum=479105825

What do you want in your Christian Manga?


DoJ Blacks out Supreme Courts Quotes
Topic: Society 8:43 pm EDT, Aug 29, 2004

] This would be interesting for those of you that oft read the
] blurt'ed pdf's off crypto.me and slashdot.

DoJ Blacks out Supreme Courts Quotes


Original Star Wars Fan Goodness
Topic: Society 4:23 pm EDT, Apr 25, 2004

Rating: NC-17 for homoerotic implications

Original Star Wars Fan Goodness


suicide
Topic: Society 6:00 am EST, Dec 10, 2003

this is so fucked up and sad...

suicide


RE: Chilling Effects Analysis of the Blackboard Case
Topic: Society 12:42 pm EST, Dec  7, 2003

There were a few interesting [yet unrelated] side-facts about the case that prevented it from being as cut and dry as it needs to be for the media to take the side of the evil hackers and see it as a suppression of speech.

Rattle wrote:
] I'm still quite frustrated that this did not get more
] attention when it happened. It was a clear case of a company
] using the law to suppress speech, and it went off without a
] hitch..
]
] ] In the end, Blackboard was able to use the law to ban two
] ] students from speaking at a conference, conducting
] ] security research and publicly criticizing its product.
] ] As long as such efforts prove effective, other
] ] individuals and corporations will continue to misuse the
] ] law in order to censor speech and other legitimate
] ] activities. Those concerned with chilling effects should
] ] take note.

RE: Chilling Effects Analysis of the Blackboard Case


<< 1 - 2 >> Older (First)
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0