Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

CNN.com - Bush: Schools should teach 'intelligent design' - Aug 2, 2005

search

Mike the Usurper
Picture of Mike the Usurper
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Mike the Usurper's topics
Arts
  Literature
  Movies
Business
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
Recreation
Local Information
Science
Society
  Education
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Intellectual Property
  Media
Sports
Technology

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
CNN.com - Bush: Schools should teach 'intelligent design' - Aug 2, 2005
Topic: Current Events 3:24 pm EDT, Aug  3, 2005

During a round-table interview with reporters from five Texas newspapers, Bush declined to go into detail on his personal views of the origin of life. But he said students should learn about both theories, Knight Ridder Newspapers reported.

"I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought," Bush said. "You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes."

This whole "we should teach different ideas" is retarded. There are ideas that life spawns from rotten meat. There are ideas that the US forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbor because of an oil embargo. There are ideas that the earth is hollow.

The point is there are ideas for everything, and we don't teach them all. We have some criteria that concepts have to meet to be taught. In science classes, that criteria is the scientific method.

I quote the Intelligent Design article on Wikipedia:

Critics call ID religious dogma repackaged in an effort to return creationism into public school science classrooms and note that ID features notably as part of the campaign known as Teach the Controversy. The National Academy of Sciences and the National Center for Science Education assert that ID is not science, but creationism. While the scientific theory of evolution by natural selection has observable and repeatable facts to support it such as the process of mutations, gene flow, genetic drift, adaptation and speciation through natural selection, the "Intelligent Designer" in ID is neither observable nor repeatable. This violates the scientific requirement of falsifiability. ID violates Occam's Razor by postulating an entity or entities to explain something that may have a simpler and scientifically supportable explanation not involving unobservable help.

ID is *not* science. It should not be taught in a *science* class. Doing so undermines the entire point of science. Bush's complete misunderstanding of this is beyond excuse.

That sound you hear is future doctors and engineers turning into ditch diggers in Mexico beacause our education system isn't up to teaching the skills they need.

CNN.com - Bush: Schools should teach 'intelligent design' - Aug 2, 2005



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0