Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Child Porn Law Debated in Court

search

Shannon
Picture of Shannon
Shannon's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Shannon's topics
Arts
  Literature
  Movies
  Music
  Photography
  Theater
  TV
Business
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
  North Ireland
Recreation
Local Information
Science
Society
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Child Porn Law Debated in Court
Topic: Miscellaneous 2:37 pm EST, Jan  8, 2004

Blocking access to websites doesn't interfere with free speech because Internet addresses aren't real, according to the Pennsylvania attorney general's office.
After receiving notice, an ISP has five days to block users' access to the website. Failure to comply carries fines of up to $30,000 and jail terms of up to seven years.

But attorneys for the CDT argued that over 1 million websites that do not contain child pornography have also been blocked since the attorney general's office started sending out notices to ISPs in April 2002.

Apparently URL adresses are magical. And you should burn down the whole strip mall if it has one porn shop.

Child Porn Law Debated in Court



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0