Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

The Origins of American Felony Murder Rules by Guyora Binder :: SSRN

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
The Origins of American Felony Murder Rules by Guyora Binder :: SSRN
Topic: Miscellaneous 2:00 pm EDT, Apr 16, 2012

Contemporary commentators continue to instruct lawyers and law students that England bequeathed America a sweeping default principle of strict liability for all deaths caused in all felonies. This Article exposes the harsh "common law" felony murder rule as a myth. It retraces the origins of American felony murder rules to reveal their modern, American, and legislative sources, the rationality of their original scope, and the fairness of their original application. It demonstrates that the draconian doctrine of strict liability for all deaths resulting from all felonies was never enacted into English law or received into American law.

A lot of deeply unjust aspects of our system are the product of undue and historically inaccurate deference to supposed ancient principles which authoritarians claim they cannot now overturn, you know, due to their ancientness. Many of these ancient principles are not nearly as ancient as their defenders claim. For example, the Supreme Court rests our "anything goes" border search doctrine on ancient principles whose history is thinly documented and which several observers have questioned.

This article makes it very clear that nothing about the history of felony murder justifies charging someone with that crime because they got in a car accident in conjunction with a felony.

In historical felony murder cases in America:

There are no cases of a victim voluntarily contributing to his or her own death. There are no suicides, no voluntary drug overdoses, no overzealous police officers plunging off roofs or into icy rivers or in front of carriages while pursuing felons. There are no cases of victims having heart attacks out of mere fright (although there is one case in which a victim died while struggling with an assailant). There are no cases of victims getting the wrong medicine or contracting diseases at hospitals, or getting killed accidentally in traffic (unless you consider a planned train wreck accidental). Perhaps most importantly, there are no cases of feloniously shooting at livestock or game and unforeseeably hitting a man. So the proposal in the English treatises to predicate murder liability on accidental death in stealing poultry was never put into practice in England or America.

In reviewing nineteenth-century American felony murder convictions, we come across no freak accidents of any kind.

The Origins of American Felony Murder Rules by Guyora Binder :: SSRN



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0