Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Court Told It Lacks Power in Detainee Cases - washingtonpost.com

search

skullaria
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

skullaria's topics
Arts
  Fine Arts
  Fiction
  Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
  Photography
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Repair and Improvement
  Parenting
  Pets
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
  North Ireland
Recreation
  Astrology
  Martial Arts
Local Information
  Georgia
   Atlanta
    Atlanta Events
Science
  Astronomy
  Biology
  Environment
  Geology
  Medicine
  Space
Society
  Activism
  Crime
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
  Relationships
  Religion
  Security
Sports
Technology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Cyber-Culture
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
   Computer Networking
   Linux
   Microsoft Windows
   Perl Programming
   PHP Programming
   Spam
   Web Design
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Court Told It Lacks Power in Detainee Cases - washingtonpost.com
Topic: Politics and Law 3:20 am EDT, Oct 22, 2006

In a notice dated Wednesday, the Justice Department listed 196 pending habeas cases, some of which cover groups of detainees. The new Military Commissions Act (MCA), it said, provides that "no court, justice, or judge" can consider those petitions or other actions related to treatment or imprisonment filed by anyone designated as an enemy combatant, now or in the future.

The relevant section from Section 9 of Article 1 of the Constitution:

The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

It seems to me that the two positions are in direct opposition, on multiple grounds, and when that is the case, the Constitution wins.

Nice try, but this one don't fly Il Dupe. It's called "Violating the Oath of Office," and it means, "move back to Crawford you piece of crap."

Court Told It Lacks Power in Detainee Cases - washingtonpost.com



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0